IMPORTANT: Keep in mind that generative AI tools can produce biased and inaccurate content. Any content generated by AI should be thoroughly verified for accuracy through human review and additional research.
Remember to check with your instructor. Some instructors might not allow any use of ChatGPT and others might allow only limited use.
If you are allowed to use A.I. tools in an academic assignment, there are some general guidelines for citing (APA and MLA guides are included on this page). Keep in mind that these guidelines are not "set in stone" and are merely suggested templates at this point. Your instructor has the final say in how they want you to cite or acknowledge any use of AI.
Your instructor may also ask for an appendix that includes the prompts that you provided to ChatGPT or the full transcript of your interaction.
To acknowledge your use of generative AI: Acknowledging and Citing Generative AI in Academic Work.
There’s a lot of discussion about whether it’s okay to include generative AI (GenAI) tools—like ChatGPT, Copilot, or Gemini—in your references. These tools are constantly evolving, so the rules aren’t always clear. When in doubt, ask your instructor. They have the final say in how your papers and assignments should be structured.
Don’t use GenAI to write your assignments unless your instructor says it’s okay. Doing so without permission is considered plagiarism.
Cite the original source (if applicable). Just like with Wikipedia, always look for the original source and use that instead. If a GenAI tool doesn't provide a source, ask it to. Make sure that the source provided actually exists and cite that instead (but only if it is an acceptable source).
Using GenAI without guidance can hurt your learning. It may limit your growth in critical thinking, creativity, and analysis—skills that are essential for academic success.
GenAI isn’t like a regular source. It doesn’t have a real author, its answers can change each time, and it doesn’t “think”—it just predicts text. So, you can’t fully trust what it generates.
Citation rules are still developing. MLA, APA, and other style guides offer suggestions, but they’re not final. Your instructor decides how you should cite GenAI content.
If GenAI use is allowed, ask your instructor how to cite it properly. Don’t assume—always check.
OpenAI (2023). ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) [Large language model]. https://chatgpt.com
Microsoft (2023). Copilot [Large language model]. https://copilot.microsoft.com
Google (2025). Gemini (Flash 2.5) [Large language model]. https://gemini.google.com
OpenAI (2023). ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) [Large language model]. https://chatgpt.com/share/685c4817-9da0-8002-85c4-8cdd0374b087
Perplexity AI (2025). Perplexity (v4.0.0) [Large language model]. https://www.perplexity.ai/search/what-is-the-release-date-for-p-rMylex_YTf6gYLlkiTHKkQ
Company or creator of the tool. (Year this version was released). Name of the AI tool or model (Version Number, Date, or Name - if known) [Type of AI model]. URL to the general AI tool site or to the specific content if publicly available
Author:
Year:
Version:
URL:
There’s a lot of discussion about whether it’s okay to include generative AI (GenAI) tools—like ChatGPT, Copilot, or Gemini—in your references. These tools are constantly evolving, so the rules aren’t always clear. When in doubt, ask your instructor. They have the final say in how your papers and assignments should be structured.
Don’t use GenAI to write your assignments unless your instructor says it’s okay. Doing so without permission is considered plagiarism.
Cite the original source (if applicable). Just like with Wikipedia, always look for the original source and use that instead. If a GenAI tool doesn't provide a source, ask it to. Make sure that the source provided actually exists and cite that instead (but only if it is an acceptable source).
Using GenAI without guidance can hurt your learning. It may limit your growth in critical thinking, creativity, and analysis—skills that are essential for academic success.
GenAI isn’t like a regular source. It doesn’t have a real author, its answers can change each time, and it doesn’t “think”—it just predicts text. So, you can’t fully trust what it generates.
Citation rules are still developing. MLA, APA, and other style guides offer suggestions, but they’re not final. Your instructor decides how you should cite GenAI content.
If GenAI use is allowed, ask your instructor how to cite it properly. Don’t assume—always check.
"How do you make coffee using a French press?" prompt. ChatGPT, GPT-4o, OpenAI, 25 June 2025, chatgpt.com.
"Prompt text" prompt. Title of AI Tool, Version (if available), Publisher of AI Tool (unless same as website name), Date Content was Generated, URL of AI Tool or Link to Specific Content Generated (do not include https:// at the beginning).
Author:
Title of Source (Prompt):
Version:
Publisher:
If the publisher of the AI tool is essentially the same as the name of the tool, you do not need to include it.
If you cannot find a publisher listed on the site of the tool, it is likely the same as the tool name, so skip it.
URL: