If you do not know yourself, how can you possibly know what you want to do for a career? The first phase of career and life planning involves answering the question, “Who Am I?” This phase entails taking time to study yourself in depth and understanding things such as:
One way to get an idea of what type of work will suit you best, is to take an assessment. There are many different types of assessments to help you figure out your preferences, personality, and interests. The Holland Code of Occupational Interest (HCOI), or Holland Code, was developed by American psychologist, Dr. John L. Holland in the early 1950s. The Holland Code includes six major personality or interest types. The idea is for a person to use the codes to help them better understand which career fields or work environments most closely align with their interests. When you choose a career or work environment that aligns with your interests, you are more likely to thrive and succeed. [1][2]
These six types are sometimes referred to by the acronym RIASEC. Read over the different RIASEC characteristics and work environments below and consider your first, second, and third choice interests.
Now that you have an idea of the different code types, you can begin to explore the types of careers that may be best suited for you. Dr. Holland studied people who were successful and happy in many occupations and matched their occupations to their occupational type, creating a description of the types of occupations that are best suited to each personality type. Just as many individuals are more than one personality type, many jobs show a strong correlation to more than one occupational type.
You can use the U.S. Department of Labor’s O*NET Online website (https://www.onetonline.org) to see occupations categorized by RIASEC code. From the O*NET webpage, find the section that allows you to Browse by O*NET Data. One of the data points listed is Interests. The six RIASEC or Holland code types are listed on the page with brief descriptions. Choose a code type to see a list of occupations associated with that code.
Additionally, O*NET provides free access to an Interest Profiler, which is an assessment tool built using the Holland codes.
Figure 5.1 O*NET Interest Profiler
Once you complete the Interest Profiler, you can use the Holland codes it provides to better understand what types of work environments might suit you best. You will typically record the three codes with the highest assigned value and use those as your Holland code. In addition to Holland codes, the profiler assigns careers to five Job Zones, which are groups of careers that need the same level of experience, education, and training. The profiler will inquire how much training and education you are comfortable with pursuing to better match job types with your interest profile.
For example, you may receive the following scores for each code:
In this case, your Holland Code would be CRS (Conventional, Realistic, Social) with conventional (C) scoring highest with 25, followed by realistic (R) scoring 16, then social (S) with a score of 9.
Figure 5.2 O*NET Interest Profiler Results
Self-assessment is an important piece of the puzzle when trying to figure out your major and career interests. After having thought about your personality and interests in terms of the Holland Code (RAISEC), you are better equipped to answer the question, “Who Am I?” While self-discovery can take a lifetime as you go through different experiences and life circumstances, you now have some information that perhaps you did not have before. Though your “codes” may change slightly over time, understanding more about your preferences and interests right now, and how they relate to various careers and work environments, you will have a better understanding of where to start.
Footnotes:
1. Wei, R. (2024). Examining the influence of the RIASEC theory within the Holland code on students’ academic performance in their chosen disciplines among the context of higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2391274
2. Shatkin, L. (2007). 90-minute college major matcher. JIST Publishing.
This content has been adapted from:
Chapters 25 (Dillon) is a derivative of: